Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day Vulnerability in VLC (this is my first release of the vuln anywhere)

[Gregory Boddin <gregory@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

You have to think about end-users as well ... Those are impacted first, not
the vendors.





On 23 April 2013 16:51, Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Completely disagree.
>
> IMHO nobody should bother negotiating with terrorist vendors.
>
> Q: What responsibility vendors have?
> A: Zero. Check their disclaimers.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:14:53PM +0200, Gregory Boddin wrote:
> > That's indeed not rocket science.
> >
> > Nobody should release their disclosure/exploit (or give hint about it) in
> > the wild before letting the vendor fix it.
> >
> > There's already enough blackhats out there selling/using those.
> >
> > I sure hope I am not the only person in the list who wishes responsible
> > > disclosure.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Henri Salo
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> > >
> > > iEYEARECAAYFAlF2eWAACgkQXf6hBi6kbk8p+QCgkrzZnNpipCMC/kexFq8OR3Q2
> > > NiIAnRMYicxFqmJhvjLIEZolEKjQcEEE
> > > =q78V
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > >
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/