[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] VUPEN Security Research - Adobe Flash Player RTMP Data Processing Object Confusion (CVE-2013-2555)
- To: "noloader@xxxxxxxxx" <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] VUPEN Security Research - Adobe Flash Player RTMP Data Processing Object Confusion (CVE-2013-2555)
- From: Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:13:32 +0100
It was a perfect example of a largely deployed application which utilises
security engineers, and has pushed patches/code which was ineffective. My point
was that bugs like that are a lot easier to sort in a design or development
stage than after the fact when remediation time is tight, and that a 'QA'
process of any type will not make up for developer mistakes.
Sent from my iPhone.
On 22 Apr 2013, at 07:39, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Because security engineers are different to a QA department you originally
>> suggested, and you seem to be very ideologist about the scenarios. As we've
>> seen, Oracle's Java product has security engineers and this has not
>> prevented flaws.
> Oracle is probably not a good example since it leaves known flaws in
> the code base.
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Java-7-Update-21-closes-security-holes-and-restricts-applets-1843558.html:
>
> The warnings for Java applets now come in two types: an applet that
> has a valid certificate generates a warning dialog with the Java logo
> in it and details of the applet's certificate, but an applet that is
> signed with an invalid certificate, is unsigned or self-signed, will
> generate a warning with a yellow shield and warning triangle which is
> designed to recommend that the applet should not be run. There is a
> problem though with the certificate checking; as The H reported in
> March, criminals were using revoked certificates as part of their
> attacks and the Java runtime was doing nothing to check the validity
> of certificates. On the latest update of Java, this has not changed
> either; online validation and revocation checks are still off by
> default.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/