Re: [Full-disclosure] Google's robots.txt handling

[Christoph Gruber <list@xxxxxxx>]

On 12.12.2012 at 00:23 "Lehman, Jim" <jim.lehman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It is possible to use white listing for robots.txt. Allow what you want 
> google to index and deny everything else. That way google doesn't make you a 
> goole dork target and someone browsing to your robots.txt file doesn't glean 
> any sensitive files or folders. But this will not stop directory bruting to 
> discover your publicly exposed sensitive data, that probably should not be 
> exposed to the web in the first place. 

Maybe I misunderstood something, but do you really think that "sensitive" can 
be hidden in "secret" directories on publicly reachable web servers?
-- 
Christoph Gruber
By not reading this email you don't agree you're not in any way affiliated with 
any government, police, ANTI- Piracy Group, RIAA, MPAA, or any other related 
group, and that means that you CANNOT read this email.
By reading you are not agreeing to these terms and you are violating code 
431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995.
(which doesn't exist)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/