[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Office Excel 2010 memory corruption
- To: kaveh ghaemmaghami <kavehghaemmaghami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Office Excel 2010 memory corruption
- From: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:31:19 -0700
Of course, if you can control the crash address so it is >=0x1000, then it
could be exploitable, but until then it is not.
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 06:53:52 +0330
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Office Excel 2010 memory corruption
> From: kavehghaemmaghami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: yuhongbao_386@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Yuhong thank you so much fore sharing
>
> is OK if i ask some question ? if its ok you can answer me
>
> what is the fast way to find out crash cause like use-after-free
> double free and heap corruption ?
> i mean to figure out if there is heap corruption like use-after free
> double free etc ....
>
> this crash analayzer scares me
>
> look at the crash was null pointer and how the hell other guy analyze
> it and found out its exploitable
>
> http://securityevaluators.com/files/papers/CrashAnalysis.pdf
>
> Best Regards
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> How can i make sure a crash is not exploitable?
> > Look at the crash address (null dereference will be < 0x1000) and type of
> > exception.
> > Also type G in WinDbg to see if it is handled.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/