Re: [Full-disclosure] Multiple 0-days in Dark Comet RAT

[Pascal Ernster <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 17:59:13 +0100
Philip Whitehouse <philip@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Does 0-day have any meaning any more? It used to mean there were
> exploits in the wild used to cause damage before the vendor patched
> it not merely that a security researcher found it and disclosed it to
> the public before the vendor did.
> 
> If a 0 day is everything found by a security team before a vendor
> then the term will loose all purpose and meaning because almost all
> work done by such researchers is finding vulns. before the vendor.

I suppose it turns into a 0 day when you post it on this mailing list
and happen to be in the mood to put the vendor's marketing division on
BCC.

-1 day could be when you ask a friend to check your mail to this ML for
major grammar errors before you post it.

> End rant.
> 
> Philip Whitehouse
> 
> On 8 Oct 2012, at 21:33, "Hertz, Jesse" <jesse_hertz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > SQL Injection and Arbitrary File Access present in Command and
> > Control server of DarkComet RAT
> > 
> > for more info see:
> > http://matasano.com/research/PEST-CONTROL.pdf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/