[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC



You misunderstand.  I wasn't "bitching" about anything.  I was simply noting 
the truth about how disclosure really works, what it is, and what it does.    I 
don't have any actual "position" about it one way or the other.  While I know 
it is fun for us to poke back and forth, don't let your predisposed attitude 
towards me cloud your interpretation of what I write.  I fully review 
everything you post with  an open mind (as I did with the GPG key issues) 
before replying.  

What exactly are you pointing out here?   I'm curious to know exactly what you 
think my stance was.  Just to be clear, I hope you understand that I could not 
care less if someone goes about FD.   I wouldn't care even if it were regarding 
a bug in my own tools.   I was all about "intent" not "action."

Seriously, what do you think I was saying?


Oh, and P.S.  I actually like the "satanic writer" bit - that made me LOL.  I 
think you (and many others) will be quite surprised to see what my next book is 
about.  Syngress and I have all but signed the contract.  Dare I say YOU may 
even buy it.  That's too much.  Dare I say YOU may even steal it of BT.  :)

t

On Aug 1, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:

> Dear Thor, satanic writer, weasely
> 
> The ubisoft bug in this thread hit Theregister.
> 
> Won't you please bitch about "Responsible disclosure" again?
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/