[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC
- To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] AxMan ActiveX fuzzing <== Memory Corruption PoC
- From: Thor <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:47:41 -0700
You misunderstand. I wasn't "bitching" about anything. I was simply noting
the truth about how disclosure really works, what it is, and what it does. I
don't have any actual "position" about it one way or the other. While I know
it is fun for us to poke back and forth, don't let your predisposed attitude
towards me cloud your interpretation of what I write. I fully review
everything you post with an open mind (as I did with the GPG key issues)
before replying.
What exactly are you pointing out here? I'm curious to know exactly what you
think my stance was. Just to be clear, I hope you understand that I could not
care less if someone goes about FD. I wouldn't care even if it were regarding
a bug in my own tools. I was all about "intent" not "action."
Seriously, what do you think I was saying?
Oh, and P.S. I actually like the "satanic writer" bit - that made me LOL. I
think you (and many others) will be quite surprised to see what my next book is
about. Syngress and I have all but signed the contract. Dare I say YOU may
even buy it. That's too much. Dare I say YOU may even steal it of BT. :)
t
On Aug 1, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> Dear Thor, satanic writer, weasely
>
> The ubisoft bug in this thread hit Theregister.
>
> Won't you please bitch about "Responsible disclosure" again?
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/