[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] sandboxed browsing



+1 for wget - that's about the only "safe" option. That way there's no JS
execution / rendering, so little to worry about.
On Aug 1, 2012 7:00 AM, "Christian Sciberras" <uuf6429@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I use Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP, obviously!
>
>
> On a more serious note, I doubt there's a safer alternative,
> except maybe not going there in the first place (or just wget-ing it
> instead).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Who uses something other than a browser in a virtual machine to follow
>> suspicious/possibly malicious links?
>>
>> If you do, what do you use, and how did you choose it?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/