[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
- To: "'Kyle Creyts'" <kyle.creyts@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
- From: "Michael J. Gray" <mgray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:32:58 -0700
I'm glad Google took the report so seriously and corrected the problem
before anyone could do anything scary with it. Oh wait...
Thanks for the link Kyle.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.creyts@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 11:58 AM
To: Michael J. Gray
Cc: Jann Horn; full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
from full-disclosure to in-the-wild in less than 3 weeks
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2012-May/086850.html
to http://share.cloudflare.com/3g1X141s2s3J2G2Z0e0O
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Creating test accounts and reproducing this bug sounds like a
> responsible thing to do.
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Michael J. Gray <mgray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> That was a bit ambiguous and I apologize for that. I meant that I had
>> reproduced the issue several times, not created test accounts. I'm
>> willing to bet it's not just a few accounts being affected.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jann Horn [mailto:jannhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:39 AM
>> To: Michael J. Gray
>> Cc: 'Thor (Hammer of God)'; 'Dan Kaminsky';
>> full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
>>
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:04:43PM -0700, Michael J. Gray wrote:
>>> On why I don't want to provide my email address to Google:
>>>
>>> It's a different email address which I don't want associated with
>>> this email address for various reasons. That is why I am not going
>>> to provide
>> it.
>>>
>>> Your assumption that it's a simple piece of information and requires
>>> no effort to give out is correct, but the impact of the association
>>> is unwanted.
>>
>> Sounds reasonable.
>>
>>
>>> The fact that Google can create a test account and reproduce the
>>> issue (as I have now done several times) tells me that they want the
>>> account information for some other purpose or that they're just being
lazy.
>>
>> So, you now have a test account that doesn't reveal any secrets about
>> you and which is affected... so you could surely give Google the name
>> of that one?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
> --
> Kyle Creyts
>
> Information Assurance Professional
> BSidesDetroit Organizer
--
Kyle Creyts
Information Assurance Professional
BSidesDetroit Organizer
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/