[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
- To: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
- From: Mateus Felipe Tymburibá Ferreira <mateustymbu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:37 -0400
I'm just copying the original message's part that probably answer your
question (I did not test it...):
">From there, I attempted to log-in to my Google account with the same
> username and password.
>
> To my surprise, I was not presented with any questions to confirm my
> identity.
>
> This completes the steps required to bypass this account hijacking
> counter-measure."
Mateus Felipe Tymburibá Ferreira, M. Sc. student at
UFAM<http://portal.ufam.edu.br>
CISSP <https://www.isc2.org/cissp/default.aspx>,
OSCP<http://www.offensive-security.com/information-security-certifications/oscp-offensive-security-certified-professional/>,
OSCE<http://www.offensive-security.com/information-security-certifications/osce-offensive-security-certified-expert/>,
OSWP<http://www.offensive-security.com/information-security-certifications/oswp-offensive-security-wireless-professional/>
<https://www.isc2.org/cissp/default.aspx>
<http://www.offensive-security.com/information-security-certifications/oscp-offensive-security-certified-professional/><http://www.offensive-security.com/information-security-certifications/osce-offensive-security-certified-expert/><http://www.offensive-security.com/information-security-certifications/oswp-offensive-security-wireless-professional/>
2012/5/15 Thor (Hammer of God) <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I'm not sure I understand the issue here - the requirement for someone
> "happening to come across your username and password" is a pretext.
>
> Logging on to the web interface where you can change password and other
> personal information as well as verify existing site cookies affords the
> service the ability to check these sorts of things. But you logged on via
> IMAP, which is its own service just like POP3 or SMTP. These services
> can't check where you are or for the existence of a cookie, so I'm not
> really sure what your expectation is, or why this is being presented as an
> issue. Am I missing something?
>
> Timothy "Thor" Mullen
> www.hammerofgod.com
> Thor's Microsoft Security Bible
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jason Hellenthal
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 9:32 AM
> To: Michael J. Gray
> Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Accounts Security Vulnerability
>
>
> LMFAO!
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 04:22:30AM -0700, Michael J. Gray wrote:
> > Effective since May 1, 2012.
> >
> > Products Affected: All Google account based services
> >
> >
> >
> > Upon attempting to log-in to my Google account while away from home, I
> > was presented with a message that required me to confirm various
> > details about my account in order to ensure I was a legitimate user
> > and not just someone who came across my username and password. Unable
> > to remember what my phone number from 2004 was, I looked for a way
> around it.
> >
> > The questions presented to me were:
> >
> > Complete the email address: a******g@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Complete the phone number: (425) 4**-***7
> >
> >
> >
> > Since this was presented to me, I was certain I had my username and
> > password correct.
> >
> > >From there, I simply went to check my email via IMAP at the new
> location.
> >
> > I was immediately granted access to my email inboxes with no trouble.
> >
> >
> >
> > >From there, I attempted to log-in to my Google account with the same
> > username and password.
> >
> > To my surprise, I was not presented with any questions to confirm my
> > identity.
> >
> > This completes the steps required to bypass this account hijacking
> > counter-measure.
> >
> >
> >
> > This just goes to show that even the largest corporations that employ
> > teams of security experts, can also overlook very simple issues.
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> --
>
> - (2^(N-1))
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/