[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] The Mystery of the Duqu Framework
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The Mystery of the Duqu Framework
- From: Andrew King <aking1012.com@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:53:57 -0400
I think EVERYONE said it was a C implementation + something to get it to
C. The interesting part that they glossed over, was the randomness in how
arguments were passed. They specifically left that part out of the solved
analysis. Just my 2 cents.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:59 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:38:52 BST, Mario Vilas said:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Sanguinarious Rose <
> SanguineRose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Here let me re-quote my email for *prosperity*
>
> > I don't think that word means what you think it means.
>
> No, it means what Sang said - sholuld be able to parley that "I guessed it
> before
> any of the Kaspersky crew" into a nice job offer eventually. :)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/