[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] can you answer this?
- To: fxchip@xxxxxxxxx, james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] can you answer this?
- From: "doomxd@xxxxxxxxx" <doomxd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:10:51 +1100
Arserspeage.haha.
Fku lamer.
----- Reply message -----
From: "Zach C." <fxchip@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "funsec" <funsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "RandallM" <randallm@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
<full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Full-disclosure] can you answer this?
Date: Fri, Feb 3, 2012 8:04 pm
The original message reads thus:
> i was working with cleaning up "any to any" on fw. ran across inside
> ips doing netbios (NS) , and one using port 4330 to 7.8.0.106, or
> .107.
>
> a who is give .miil DoD Network Information Center.
>
> ?
>
> we are just a manufacturing company. One ip is from a NAS device for
> staorage. The other is DNS server
I expect it's supposed to read like this:
"I was working on cleaning up my 'any to any' rulesets on my firewall and I ran
across internal IPs using the NetBIOS protocol, which is unexpected behavior.
One of my internal hosts also appears to be attempting to connect to 7.8.0.106
or 7.8.0.107 on port 4330. A WHOIS lookup tells me that those IPs belong to the
IP range owned by the U.S. Department of Defense.
What is going on? We're just a manufacturing company. One of the IPs
participating in this traffic is supposed to be network storage, while the
other is supposed to just do DNS."
And because no one answered him, he decided to try another line of inquiry:
"My firewall logs have also picked up traffic from our internal trusted network
to an external untrusted network with entries such as:
2012-02-02 10:08:10 7.254.254.254:68 7.254.254.255:67 0.0.0.0:0
0.0.0.0:0 DHCP 0 sec. 0 0 Traffic Denied
It was denied. What is happening here?"
I have no idea what's happening there; I'd suggest looking at the machines for
strange activity, maybe doing some tcpdumps and seeing if you can trace back
any of the packets you find to any of your machines. But I can't think of any
reason your internal machines should be trying to connect to those hosts.
(Especially considering those hosts may not exist!)
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:31 AM, <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So what's the question?
------Original Message------
From: RandallM
Sender: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: funsec
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Full-disclosure] can you answer this?
Sent: 3 Feb 2012 08:20
since no one could answer the last one how bout this. In my FW log
Trust (our 10.0.0.0. network) to untrust picked this up:
2012-02-02 10:08:10 7.254.254.254:68 7.254.254.255:67 0.0.0.0:0
0.0.0.0:0 DHCP 0 sec. 0 0 Traffic Denied
My "any" to "any" denied queue.
--
been great, thanks
RandyM
a.k.a System
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/