On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:20:17 +1100, xD 0x41 said: > yea...well, they think I am you...so... > lol, i hope they do :P > On 26 January 2012 09:10, andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > My lawyers are looking through this thread to see if anything libelous has > > been said against me or the n3td3v organisation. Given that I'm *still* waiting for him to carry through with his repeated threats to sue me for a BlackHat 2006 presentation that I didn't even write, I wouldn't worry too much about Andrew's lawyers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel_by_acquiescence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_limitations (see period of prescription) (Andrew - I'd avoid saying your lawyers are looking at the thread, unless you actually *do* have lawyers looking. You just set the clock ticking on an acquiescence defense or a period of prescription) And I've always wondered exactly who/what the "n3td3v organization" is - there doesn't seem to be a consultancy doing actual business under that name, or other legal entity that would have standing in a libel suit. Who/what gets listed as plaintiff? (You may as well tell us Andrew - if we don't know who "the n3td3v organization" is, we can't make an attempt to avoid accidentally libeling it. :)
Attachment:
pgpcRZbIXoCYo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/