Re: [Full-disclosure] [CVE-2012-0207] Linux IGMP Remote Denial Of Service

[root <root_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

You already have a good reputation as a bug-finder.
IMHO, releasing additional research in a hurry like this can only
tarnish that reputation and feed the trolls.
Providing a kernel stack trace ( http://imgur.com/klC4k ) or a more
reliable PoC can't take more than an hour, and it will greatly enhance
the quality of the report.

If you are worried several people has founded a particular bug and
publication is imminent, then maybe was not such a great find to begin
with :)






On 01/19/2012 02:32 PM, HI-TECH . wrote:
> Hi XD,
> 
> Am 19. Januar 2012 15:27 schrieb xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Oh and btw, that coding style, just aint you dude... you know,
>> everyone has theyre own fingerprint, i find it really hard to think
>> that, you just made this mistakes in cksum area,wich was area wich
>> actually does the exploiting :P , so why release crap ? why not make
> 
> I release it because it worked for me INSIDE TWO VM's, I had no clue about the
> checksum error. I didnt cripple it. It worked in my tests because I
> bet the vmware
> did adjust the checksums to be correct.
> Why release that crap? Because I wanted to be the first to release an
> exploit for it
> for fame and glory and it was coded in a hurry, I was thinking it
> actually works (I am doing
> more tests now on real hardware so I can be sure)
> 
>> it half decent, and as i said, it was not even your coding style so im
>> finding this really hard to believe it wwas yours, maybe was modified
>> , from many many similars, but, i guess thats normal... you tend to
> 
> It is modified code from other coders as stated in the header.
> 
>> use perl, and bash alot, within your bash, is the .c, and that is your
>> style... like zx2c has, like dan rosenberg and JO, all kep the same
>> style, because it is habit for any coder.. you dont just change styles
>> this fast, or did you get some realllly good ebooks coz, show me where
>> you found so i can catch up to it :P)
> 
> I didnt change my coding style, it was just done in a hurry so Dan or
> Jon wouldnt beat me on that BWHAHAHA.
> 
>> Love you long time pal, but, find this one abit shitty, and, i do like
>> everything in past, your codes going back to you know when, but this
>> is bs, and if you were gonna rls it, you shulda fucked with the
>> numbers maybe, but, let it fkn run, it was made as poc for lan test
>> right, so why cripple it, thats just silly... thats why i attack it,
>> and, i dont really care a shit who coded it, but, i doubt it was
>> anyone in that code.
> 
> You can attack it its your opinion and thats totally fine. I didnt
> cripple the code
> actually.
> 
>> have a good day and, no offence over this but, it just shits me when
>> people, who know better, go out of theyre way and release publically,
>> shit wich is fucked up and, in this case, would waste a persons time,
>> and, you even put tested on, and, now, how would it be tested with
>> that cksum, please explain that then, your saying you dont have time
>> but stop bullshit man, you crippled it, just fkn admit it, it could
>> NOT work setup, without the damn cksum, as it was part of sento! how
>> could this, be any use, even with the settings back to old, without my
>> edit.... you show me one fucking real test, i mean, compile the code,
>> infront of people, then go make your fYT vids, seriously, I have told
>> Jon Oberheldie this, and others, str8 up, if you release crippled
>> shit, your as shit as what you cripple mate.
> 
> You forget about all the codes I rlsed before. As I said this was done
> in a hurry. You had a look at roaring beast ? How can you tell me I send
> crippled codes out? Buddy I m human too and do mistakes.
> 
>> thats just my point of view and really, this is d0s, wich, i dont care
>> for..im saying, you dont see AB release some fucked up exploit every
> 
> AB? whos that ?
> 
>> 2months, and makeSURE it dont work , you dont see anyone release shit
>> like this anymore with such blatant errors, its just shitty, luckily i
>> nano'd it, yea, i like nano ok, or i would have wasted time
> 
> wtf ? come on.. nano.. this is getting silly
> 
>> kcope...its just that simple, and no offences atall, i was able to
>> spot this, but, do not sit there, telling me and everyone else, that
>> it was working, tested... coz, we both know that was NOT the same code
>> released, you cannot deny the code.... simple.
>> you screwed this one up. go back to exploiting :P itsd better and your
>> better at it! :P
> 
> As I said I tested it with two VMS in a testbed and both Ubuntu and
> OpenSUSE crashed
> instantly.
> 
>> I like your shit, but, i realllllly prefer, when kxcope, is thinking
>> of b0f and new methods etc, like i know the one from 2009 did, and
>> found the biggest remote hole ever,and you even released this , and
>> people can hate you and whatever but there is no denying it, your damn
>> skilled, so im just saying, i dont like crippled work, nowdays, and
>> when it is released with a mark of approval, from someone i trust.
> 
> Its 2011 and I found a bug in FreeBSD ftpd. Which is better than ProFTPD coz
> it rocks, have you ever seen a bug in FreeBSD ftpd since ~10 years ?
> 
>> this is private, and, stays here but, this is why i attacked you dude,
>> and, nothing bad about it, it stays here, and, thats it... i wont say
>> shit, i have said what i wanted, your a nice guy, i like you, so,
>> thats all, i just dont want to see you ending up like them other fags,
>> they have 0 respect UG... you do atleast have that... fuck fd lists
>> respect... but still, you just had to leave out that line 'tested' ;)
> 
> I like the public scene more than the dark one.
> 
>> ok, sorry for any confusion etc but, thats all i think and, i want you
>> to know exactly what i think, and know i am not being mean atall...
>> and apologise for even puttingthat retort onto fd..i should have just
> OMG how the ***** you have time to write me so long lines ?
> 
>> pmd you, but i loose sight of your nickname sometimes...anyhow... i
>> hope your not offended but, i did not try to offend you atall, i just
>> found it really weird that yopu released that and, it was shitty
>> lol... lan d0s :P i mean, we could have lan PARTY now, we could all
>> get drunk and crunk but, not lan-d0s :P
> 
> HEHE, I want to see the CCC Hackerspace got hit by that.
> 
>> hehe, tcare man, i fucking find you one of my inspirations and why i
>> get up everyday, is to greet the people, who have some repspect in
>> them, i will makesure also the post goes only for regged members or
>> sumthin also, just to make it abit harder i guess for ppl to look
>> at...fkit.. i should not have even bothered saying shit but, i love
>> packets :P
> 
> I have respect of you too. But next time please dont rls my FreeBSD locals
> on pastebin.
> 
>> i just do, and, i added the other codes, so anyone could modify the
>> other codes, or port it to windows... and, nothing more... it is only
>> a frag adding app, and shows basic socket use... nothing more... so,
>> it was basically, an adon, to your tool, it would be nice to do a test
>> with fragging.. anyhow, i might do that myself...see howfar this bug
>> can be pushed... take care man, i hope your cool , take it easy and
>> speak to you soon
>> drew
> 
> Ok good, so your code works actually? Over the internet ............
> This is an exercise for the interested reader.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingcope
> 
>>
>> On 20 January 2012 00:28, HI-TECH .
>> <isowarez.isowarez.isowarez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hello xD,
>>> sorry I don't understand a word you are talking about.
>>> To put everything together about what you were ranting would take too
>>> much time for me.
>>> Did I offend you in any way ?
>>> It's just a PoC for people to test their systems nothing else...
>>> I cannot check each every system if it works, I just checked two boxes
>>> and thats enough for me.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Kc
>>>
>>> Am 19. Januar 2012 04:56 schrieb xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> Now, heres the one wich works, without in_chksum bug ;)
>>>>
>>>> http://pastebin.com/x1ShKAUT
>>>>
>>>> now, sorry but,  had to try it remotely, sheesh, and, you dont
>>>> cripple, code of old bugs and, half of this code is from an old bug
>>>> anyhow, so why the heck not leave it... i guess now your starting to
>>>> look like Jon Oberheldie the king of fucked up cripples... lol...
>>>> ewnjoy folks. this version, may even work! omg isnt this amazing!!
>>>> XD says to FD a BIG FUCKS YOU ,well cept kcope and few other decent
>>>> guys like me :P ,and nme, and tropic and well, #Haxnet :)
>>>> now go fucking shoot yourselves away with your newbie working
>>>> undeadattack.. dont know why someone did not inform me they would
>>>> cripple it, and maybe forward a copy to me but, now this file, goes
>>>> where the rest go, to the shame files...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18 January 2012 08:11, HI-TECH .
>>>> <isowarez.isowarez.isowarez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Demonstration of the Exploit:
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78nAxh70yZE (thanks ClsHack)
>>>>>
>>>>> see attached content
>>>>>
>>>>> /Kingcope
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/