[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx" <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Shyaam Sundhar <shyaam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 16:25:35 -0500
Completely agreed. Availability and business is top priority for managers.
Although, once they have gained popularity and to a stage where a garage office
becomes a shop floor and a @home biz becomes a rent-a-million$-building office,
it is time to shift priorities. But again, I have no say in that, and it is
what it is.
Thank you.
Shyaam
On Jan 7, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:55:28 EST, Shyaam Sundhar said:
>
>> My question(s) would be: why are people sloppy by nature when it comes to
>> security? Why is security still considered as a blanket as opposed to the
>> core
>> of any system?
>
> In most shops, the level of competence is barely sufficient to make sure that
> the payroll system prints a check for every employee with the correct number
> on
> it. Trying to keep the system running *and* secure is beyond their competence
> level, so you have to choose one - running or secure. Most managers will
> choose 'running', because if they choose 'secure', *they* don't get a paycheck
> either...
>
> (Vastly oversimplified, but that's pretty much it in a nutshell).
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/