Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

[Mario Vilas <mvilas@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have no doubt that a lot of things are lost on you.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:23 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> are you braindead ?
> your humor, is really lost on me..so, i think, look within :P
>
>
> On 12 November 2011 04:01, Mario Vilas <mvilas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
> >> was thinking at least.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit,
> 49days
> >> >> to send a packet, my butt.
> >> >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
> >> >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
> >> >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
> >> >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
> >> >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
> >> >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
> >> >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
> >> >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
> >> >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the
> goal
> >> >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
> >> >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
> >> >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered
> with
> >> >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one
> thing,
> >> >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
> >> >
> >> > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
> >> > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
> >> > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
> >> > what I can make of your writing).
> >> >
> >> > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
> >> > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
> the enemy
> > of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military
> > becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>



-- 
“There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights the enemy
of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military
becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/