Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

[xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>]

yep!
next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it.
seems, you cannot even wait for the author to do it... as, to wich, i
have said... and, i tried to show yu also, ow to simply *catch* it...
but, you trying to get code from me, wich, i will never give you :)
so to those who care about it, and want to wait, they can then see who
is bullshitting who..

I am shocked, howmany socalled 'skilled' people, cannot get this bug
to work...  but, theyre NOT the ones whining about code :)
they probably already doing what I am, making a nice, portable cpp
version, wich, wouldnot be hard, if you already know what to start
with etc.. so, i guess idscussion, would only assist maliugn use of
code, wich i wont have , as a ms user.
Sorry but, wen the author likes, he will gief to u.
until then , go roll a joint and relax.
thx!


On 12 November 2011 03:57, Gary Baribault <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Talk is indeed cheap!
>
> Gary B
>
> On 11/11/2011 11:43 AM, Ryan Dewhurst wrote:
>> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
>> was thinking at least.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days
>>>> to send a packet, my butt.
>>>> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
>>>> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
>>>> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
>>>> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
>>>> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
>>>> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
>>>> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
>>>> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
>>>> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal
>>>> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
>>>> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
>>>> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with
>>>> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing,
>>>> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
>>> I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
>>> with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
>>> what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
>>> what I can make of your writing).
>>>
>>> No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
>>> are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/