[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] How not to deal with a vulnerability in your code
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] How not to deal with a vulnerability in your code
- From: Jeremy Visser <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 12:49:00 +1100
On 05/11/2011, at 18:24, Leon Kaiser wrote:
> The flagrant disregard for his userbase is disgusting! I just uninstalled
> calibre.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/calibre/+bug/885027/comments/90
> sudo apt-get remove calibre
The comment and "patch" you posted shows you clearly did not read the comments
in the bug report.
Ubuntu has already had the bug fixed, because they use a safe udev-based hook.
The vulnerability only applies to those who have installed Calibre from source.
So "apt-get remove calibre" is a pretty naïve comment to make, but you couldn't
resist the bashing, could you?
The reason why he's reinvented the wheel writing the insecure
calibre-mount-helper daemon is because there is no platform-agnostic solution
for auto-mounting.
Modern Linux distros need a udev hook, older ones need a HAL-based hook, BSD
needs HAL, and who knows what everyone else needs.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/