Re: [Full-disclosure] Tor anonymizing network Compromised by French researchers

[xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello!
I dont know why, but i really enjoyed his talk.
I guess i was abit in tune with the humorous side ofit, but, i think he did
a great, fun job :P
I mean, it was prettymuch a session of , dont use svn/cvs , use git ,but
with abit of fun
for once!
I like this,m aslong as it doesnt become a disturbing trend amongst linux
programmers,i doubt that,
then it was really a cool speech about git, and, although i use both git and
svn, i see no problems with svn sofar, as a simple system that is, in
comparison to gitweb/git , wich is also simple but i guess it has alot more
advantages.
i liked the video!Thanks!
xd


On 25 October 2011 08:22, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Thor (Hammer of God)
> <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > *Any* assumptions that presuppose security based on social affiliation
> need to be reconsidered.
> Linus Torvalds would disagree with you. Git is secure because Linus
> has friends :) See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 at
> 27:43.
>
> Jeff
>
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:full-disclosure-
> >>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
> >>Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 9:32 AM
> >>To: Travis Biehn
> >>Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Tor anonymizing network Compromised by
> >>French researchers
> >>
> >>On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:53:02 EDT, Travis Biehn said:
> >>
> >>> So they put up a fake network, 'hacked' most of the nodes, and with
> >>> complete control of their dummy network they were able to figure out
> >>> traffic movement?
> >>>
> >>> This is news why?
> >>
> >>It's not news - it's *long* been known that Tor would be breakable if
> >>somebody pwned a sufficient percentage of the nodes.  It's been regarded
> as
> >>a mostly theoretical attack, because the sort of people that run Tor have
> up to
> >>now been the paranoid type that tend to secure their systems better.
> >>
> >>The only part of *news* in it was this:
> >>
> >>"Researchers showed that one third of the nodes are vulnerable,"
> >>
> >>So maybe the "people who run Tor are more paranoid" assumption is flawed
> >>and needs to be reconsidered.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/