Re: [Full-disclosure] New open source Security Framework

[xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dont be angry about it, but, you could atleast give credit to those, your
paying a whole 2$ to, or even if NOT paid, you should leave AUTHOR name
INSIDE the exploit, maybe thats why it is being molested ?
GPL is fine, but, you are seen as a bad dude, simply coz you dont give
simple credit, and rather, add a patch for the thing to remove the autho, i
mean, why not allow let ppl atleast see authors nickname/name.. it is not
nice to those who put in theyre time, to help YOUR project, for whatever
reasons, and, i love github, and, this has nothing todo with github, but, i
am saying, you should never rename stuff, just take a look at 1337day.com,
or , is that yours also ;p
have a lovely day, i will look at the project, if i think it is decent, i
would even buy, a pirated version... etc...etc... you know how it is, one
copys out, 100 copies is really outtt ;)
its all good bro, keep up the good work, just leave authors names maybe,
remove email is fine, but you shuld leave author name, so ppl know maybe,
wich things will be better/more reliable code, or stabler code, perhaps,
than other authors... or, is that wrong to assume... i sure, would not like
to see some code i have wrote, on there, without atleast saying #Thanks to
xd for this one.
it is one line dude.
take it easy, dont flame up.
xd


On 6 October 2011 09:04, Juan Sacco <juansacco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> As you might know, or not know, Exploit Pack is working without any
> foundation, company, governement and money-giving guy.
> There is no professionnal coder, programmer that is paid to develop this
> program.
>
> I have tried to ensure that the name of the exploit author is seen in all
> the software.It was my bad pasting the license there, but hey! Im human give
> me a break you troll.
>
> The next time would be better if you post it in the right place, GitHub.
>
> And in fact youre trying to blame here.
>
> Exploit Pack is licensed GPL let me copy & paste the 4 freedoms. I hope to
> do it well this time.
>
> The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
> The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your
> computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a
> precondition for this.
> The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom
> 2).
> The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
> (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
> benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for
> this.
>
> Let me ask you why you are spending so much time annoying this GPL
> software?
>
> I hope next time get a patch of code from you and no nonsense again.
>
> Like I said to lroot. The same goes for YOU. If you want the right to
> demand certain things from the program, then go BUY a program and do not
> harass people who are writing software for free, or go and help the
> developers by writing the functionality yourself.
>
> Juan Sacco
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:36 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> wow i was not going to comment on that pack and have not yet looked but,
>> thats plain nasty... to remove a simple credit line, i mean it is not full
>> of greetz etc :s and replace... totally pathetic.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 October 2011 20:32, root <root_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> - * @author Stefan Zeiger (szeiger@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
>>> - print "   Written by Blake  "
>>> - <Information Author="Blake" Date="August 23 2011" Vulnerability="N/A">
>>>
>>> +#Exploit Pack - Security Framework for Exploit Developers
>>> +#Copyright 2011 Juan Sacco http://exploitpack.com
>>> +#
>>> +#This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> it under the terms of the
>>> +#GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
>>> Foundation, either version 3
>>> +#or any later version.
>>> +#
>>> +#This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
>>> WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;
>>> +#without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>>> PARTICULAR
>>> +#PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> +#
>>> +#You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>> along with this program.
>>> +#If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeeeeeeees why not?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/