[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN providers and any providers in general...



On 10/4/2011 6:35 PM, adam wrote:
"(Option 3 - the guy heads downtown on a contempt of court charge - happens so
rarely that it's basically a hypothetical)."

You do realize that (at least in the US) - contempt is *not* a criminal offense, don't you?

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:05 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx <mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:15:02 EDT, Jeffrey Walton said:
    > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@xxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:tyra3l@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    > > As I mentioned before it is hard to expect that a VPN provider
    will
    > > risk his company for your $11.52/month, and maybe they would
    try it
    > > for some lesser case, but what Lulsec did was grant, so I'm not
    > > surprised that they bent.
    >
    > "Alleged"

    Yes. So?  In most jurisdictions, "alledged" and "probable cause"
    is sufficient
    to get a court to sign off on a subpoena and/or warrants.

    "Dear Judge:  On Aug 23, a hacker using the handle
    "JustFellOutOfTree" did
    violate Section N, Clause X.Y of the criminal code by hacking into
    BigStore.com.  The connection was traced back to the provider
    VPNs-R-Us.  We
    would like a court order requesting VPNs-R-Us to provide any and all
    information they may have regarding this user".

    That will usually do it (after bulked up to about 3 pages with
    legalese and
    dotting the t's and crossing the i's).

    The next morning, the manager at VPNs-R-Us gets to his office, and
    finds
    two guys with guns and a signed piece of paper.  At which point
    one of two
    things will happen:

    1) the guy rolls and gives up all the info.
    2) the guy calls his lawyer and makes sure that he gives up all
    the required info,
    and not one byte more.

    (Option 3 - the guy heads downtown on a contempt of court charge -
    happens so
    rarely that it's basically a hypothetical).


    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
That actually depends on the situation, contempt can be criminal. And frankly if you refuse a court order for information like that, the LE officers will just seize it by gunpoint legally, then arrest you.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/