[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.2.17 exploit?



On 10/3/2011 4:29 PM, GloW - XD wrote:
There's only 4 billion IP's to scan if he want to get all out of his
trick.

Synscan can do a subnet (class b) in ~3 minutes nowdays ;)
I would think he would find it.
i did a scan on a kit i found, root:barcelona123 , and, got like 100 boxes in 10minutes of scanning, ofc, i looked up the IP range, usually they scan by range and classes, log to file, then log in. It is very fast nowdays, and very effective if done properly... i have seen this only recently become "effevive" but, it is..and there is plenty of fools who will execute it as-is... that is just, to easy, every box a kid has root on, will opfc try it *just incase that, fd is wrong* ...and i have seen one case already ;p so, it is the easiest way to engineer, *keep this private* or pvt pvt pvt dont leak!
khehe.. best trix ever.
xd


On 4 October 2011 02:29, <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    >
    >
    > http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/25728/w000t-shell.c.html
    >
    > It's a trojan, based on the w00t-shell.c code; the shell code adds a
    > passwordless root account under the name w000t.
    >

    Nice try though. I was not aware that this shellcode was freely
    available
    but after debugging the same shellcode I noticed that passwordless
    account.

    He'll have plenty of work to do while scanning for that SSH account.
    There's only 4 billion IP's to scan if he want to get all out of his
    trick.

    >
    > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:31:29 +0100
    > From: d.martyn.fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:d.martyn.fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxxx>
    > To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > Subject: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.2.17 exploit?
    >
    > I regularly trawl Pastebin.com to find code - often idiots leave
    some 0day
    > and similar there and it is nice to find.
    >
    > Well, seeing as I have no test boxes at the moment, can someone
    check this
    > code in a VM? I am not sure if it is legit or not.
    >
    >
    > http://pastebin.com/ygByEV2e
    >
    > Thanks :)
    >
    > ~Darren
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
    >


    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Someone should write a scanner that checks for that stuff + pulls RSA keys from the web and adds it to a keyring, that would be a nice scanner.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/