[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: James Condron <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:16:12 +0100
On 29 Sep 2011, at 14:04, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:53:03 BST, Benji said:
>
>> Just because something is advertised as 'anonymous' doesnt mean it's 'so
>> anonymous you can break the law' and anyone using a EU/US-related country to
>> do this is either stupid or naive.
>
> There's also those servers that advertise "anonymous and likely to stay that
> way because we've bought a few corrupt government officials". But if you're
> buying services from them, you''re neither stupid nor naive, and know
> *exactly*
> why you're doing business with them....
Yep, you're buying a service from someone who can then, by extension, be bought
themselves. Theres no money in buying off officials, its coming from somewhere-
usually the highest bidder.
Sounds pretty naive to me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/