[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Hiding Backdoors in plain sight, again
- To: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hiding Backdoors in plain sight, again
- From: Ariel Waissbein <ariel.waissbein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:33:10 -0300
On 22/7/11 12:39 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:17:33 -0300, CoreTex Team said:
>
>> Finding: Scoring Table Placebo Backdoored
>> Correctly Identified 5 (voted as placebo) 2 (voted as backdoored)
>> Incorrectly Identified -1 (voted as backdoored) -12 (voted as
>> placebo)
>
> How many points does somebody get for managing to exploit a placebo? :)
>
>
Vladis,
The rules are clear. If you say you find a backdoor in a placebo, it
does not matter if it has a backdoor or not, you get -1 points. We
cannot guarantee that a program will be non-vulnerable :)
On the other hand, if you do: then shoot us an email at info [ at:]
backdoohiding and we will reward the first one to do it!
The CoreTex team
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/