[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Announcement posts and the charter (was Re: INSECT Pro 2.5.1 released)
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Announcement posts and the charter (was Re: INSECT Pro 2.5.1 released)
- From: Tim <tim-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:01:13 -0700
> 2)Only announcements for OSI approved projects. Webappsec has this
> policy I think, and it rewards people who share the most openly.
I would argue that something like this is the best for full
disclosure. Afterall, if you release a tool, your techniques are not
really fully disclosed if you keep the source code closed.
Note that open source != free (example: commercial PGP), but I would
think the source code should be made publicly accessible, even if the
licensing is more restrictive.
However, in the case of "INSECT Pro", the frequency of posts is far
too high, regardless of other considerations.
tim
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/