[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in *McAfee.com
- To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx" <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>, Cal Leeming <cal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in *McAfee.com
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:42:13 +0000
I should clarify my use of "intent" in previous replies -
The "intent" part of the process would be from the judges point of view even in
the absence of "concrete" evidence. As you know, actual court cases are not
what we see on TV, and the judge has far more power than one may think. Even
if the defense argues that the actions by the defendant were acceptable, if the
judge thinks that the intent of the individual was to exceed access, then they
are hosed.
It wasn't meant to imply that saying "I didn't intend to bring their network
down" would be of any benefit to a defendant.
t
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 3:30 PM
To: Cal Leeming
Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerabilities in *McAfee.com
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:33:56 BST, Cal Leeming said:
> Like with most laws, the key point is "intent". If your intention was
> clearly not malicious, then you are safe.
Ask Randall Schwartz how that worked out for him. "intent" doesn't enter into
it as much as a defendant may like.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001030----000-.html
Intent is not mentioned at all. You exceed the authorized access, you're
guilty under 18 USC 1030. 1030 (a)(2)(C) is the really expansive one, as
"protected computer" is defined down in (e)(2)(B) to include anything used in
interstate commerce (and yes, DA's *HAVE* argued "The computer has a web
browser and thus could get to amazon.com, so it's interstate commerce time").
Doesn't matter if you were trying to save the world at the time (as Gary
McKinnon found out).
A better approach is to argue the definition of "authorized access" as it
applies to an Internet-facing server...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/