[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?
- To: Eyeballing Weev <eyeballing.weev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?
- From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 +0000
So here's a thought.
If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and hosted
on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would
be eligible for take down?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Eyeballing Weev
<eyeballing.weev@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Cryptome.org is your friend. John Young is pretty much bulletproof when
> it comes to file hosting and laughs at DMCA takedown requests.
>
> On 02/18/2011 11:24 AM, ck wrote:
> > So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they?
> >
> > ck
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/