On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:49:46 PST, "andrew.wallace" said: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Rankin, James R <kz20fl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I am an alter ego of netty's that he has invented to argue with in case the > > voices in his head stop talking about national security > The right to free expression can be restricted if this is necessary to protect > the reputation of others. The law of defamation allows persons who consider > that their reputation has been or may be harmed by statements made by others > to > sue for damages or to prevent the making of those statments. > http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/right-of-free-expression/defamation/index.html > You're treading on very thin ice. Fortunately for Andrew, the offense of barratry was apparently abolished in Great Britain in 1967. It may however still survive as a cause for a tort.
Attachment:
pgp6Ly2MNqRFR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/