Re: [Full-disclosure] is FD moderated or not? (hint: ask n3td3v)

[James Rankin <kz20fl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The guy is a feeble Jock troll who obviously thought this whole "National
Security" thing would get him laid.

I have to admit grudging admiration for his tenacity in that he is still
trying to make it work. Determination alone, though, does not an infosec
professional make.

On 10 February 2011 15:22, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:49:15 +0100, Christian Sciberras said:
> > Why didn't we all think about it in the first place!
> > A conspiracy, so OBVIOUS!!
>
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:38 AM, andrew.wallace <
> > andrew.wallace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > It is obvious they don't want people like me and my organisation who
> deal
> > > in national security on the list, that is why the moderation was
> > > implemented.
>
> Yep, some huge shadowy "national security organization" that nobody but the
> leader admits being a part of, it must be a conspiracy.  I wonder who out
> there
> is a sleeper agent.  Consider Gadi Evron, Marcus Sachs, and myself -
> Andrew's
> done so much to distance himself from all three of us that we must all be
> sleeper agents.  Think about that.. and who *else* might be part of the
> conspiracy.  It could go deeper than even Andrew realizes...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



-- 
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
a question."

*IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem,
no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the
intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
irritating social faux pas.

Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of
the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice
from Microsoft.

However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have
received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk
and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.*

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/