Re: [Full-disclosure] sourceforge entry point seems still active.

[exploit dev <extraexploit@xxxxxxxxx>]

just another evidence:

http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/01/sourceforge-entry-point-seems-still.html

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, wac <waldoalvarez00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So it actually happened! Not surprising at all. I suspected at first
> sight about a phish attempt because the email in another domain they
> sent for contact in case of problems with password reset (didn't
> bothered about headers anyway).
>
> Seems mine was not compromised according to what they say "Our
> analysis uncovered (among other things) a hacked SSH daemon, which was
> modified to do password capture."
>
> If i were them I would reinstall from scratch at least all SSH
> servers. They all could be compromised!
>
> On 1/30/11, exploit dev <extraexploit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sourceforge has reported a full report of attack. Seems very close to
> what I
> > wrote in previous messages and reported in my blog posts related to this
> > thread.
> >
> > Sourceforge Attack: Full Report
> > http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-attack-full-report/
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:18 PM, exploit dev <extraexploit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> just a reminder: this breach was used by php/python/perl script for get
> >> and
> >> save on user directory bot and remote shell. Also you could, as reported
> >> also in owned and exposed zine, launch commands and attempt privilege
> >> escalation. So I'm not so sure that this is not so writable as well i
> >> think
> >> is not right sayd that is not   critical.
> >>
> >> Regards-.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Farmer <andfarm@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2011-01-24, at 12:08, exploit dev wrote:
> >>> > Anyway, I'm sorry repeat my message. I think that this issue is a bit
> >>> > critical but I don't receive still any feedback,
> >>>
> >>> It's not particularly critical by any means. SourceForge projects all
> >>> have
> >>> their own web space, and there are doubtless a bunch of them running
> >>> vulnerable versions of software. These sites are relatively isolated,
> and
> >>> don't have write access to the project's SCM or downloads.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://extraexploit.blogspot.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://extraexploit.blogspot.com
> >
>



-- 
http://extraexploit.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/