[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- To: Abuse007 <abuse007@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: mark seiden <mis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:32:44 -0800
i was joking about the history of the s boxes, originally designed by ibm but
with substantial classified input from nsa.
suspicious people believed the s box changes (and the reduced key length) that
was adopted was intended to weaken des, or make it more brute-forceable by the
nsa.
the designers deny it.
the parallels between that situation and this should be evident.
On Dec 16, 2010, at 4:26 AM, Abuse007 wrote:
>
> Changing the s-boxes in DES (and therefore Triple DES as well) would break
> comparability with other implementations as it would no longer decrypt the
> same as a standard implementation.
for more you can see, among others
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/DES#NSA.27s_involvement_in_the_design
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/