[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] verizon vs m$



On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> do i get it right?:
>
> 1. the verizon paper is entirely correct

Well, sure.

> 2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?

Does it have to be either?

>
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 11:25:36PM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>> in a world like this, verizon kills exploder bugs:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/03/protected_mode_bypass/
>> http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/whitepapers/wp_escapingmicrosoftprotectedmodeinternetexplorer_en_xg.pdf
>>
>> the language doesn't seem passionate:
>> -----
>> Finally, Microsoft and other software vendors should clearly document which 
>> features do and do not
>> have associated security claims. Clearly stating which features make 
>> security claims, and which do not,
>> will allow informed decisions to be made on IT security issues.
>> -----
>>
>> lol
>>
>> --
>> joro
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/