Re: [Full-disclosure] 0-day "vulnerability"

[Josey Yelsef <hg_exposed@xxxxxxxxx>]

Great way to split hairs.  Fumbling between metaphors, you're better off 
contacting Merriam-Webster. 

--- On Thu, 10/28/10, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] 0-day "vulnerability"
To: "Curt Purdy" <infosysec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2010, 10:02 PM

> For once and for all: There is no such thing as a "zero-day
> vulnerability" (quoted), only a 0-day exploit...

Cool story, bro.

Any thoughts on the use of the term "hacker"?

/mz

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/