Re: [Full-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up

[Charles Timko <charles.timko@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed. I am all for the transparency, but WL is possibly putting our troops
at risk by releasing military strategy.  I wouldn't expect JA to think that
there is any inclination of strategy in the documents they published, but
there is a lot of strategy and a LOT of information that is now visible to
more than just United States citizens.

-timko

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:51 PM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved
up

I believe that most of the times it is not what you defend but how you
defend it.
I believe in Government transparency but the way WL is going about it it's
not right, in my honest opinion.
So this is good news in my opinion...

-r

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/