Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks

["Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

  Yeah, you both have valid points. In this case though, I really just 
don't see why everyone is so hyped up about the wikileaks / cryptome 
stuff. :S

On 07/10/2010 21:21, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
> Paul has a point Cal - one should note that a full 53% of the posts on this 
> topic (including this one) are in response to your posts about how this isn't 
> the proper list for such posts in the first place.  That means the majority 
> of the posts that you call inappropriate were actually created by you.  
> Filtering (or simply ignoring) original posts would have gone much further to 
> perpetuate your goal of less off-topic chatter.
>
> t
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:full-disclosure-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:54 AM
>> To: Paul Schmehl; full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
>>
>>   *sighs*
>>
>> On 07/10/2010 19:53, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> Then you will be whining for a long time.
>>>
>>> I was the second person to subscribe to this list, and I can guarantee
>>> you that no amount of whining will change it.  The bozos who post crap
>>> will continue to post crap.  The folks who don't understand what
>>> *un*-moderated list means will continue to complain about the bozos
>>> posting crap.  And the sun will still come up in the morning.  And the
>>> list will still go out every day. Ad infinitum ad nauseum.
>>>
>>> Either learn to use filters, stop complaining or unsubscribe.  Those
>>> are your options.  Pick one.
>>>
>>> --On Thursday, October 07, 2010 15:16:54 +0100 "Cal Leeming
>>> [Simplicity Media Ltd]"<cal.leeming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will when people stop gossiping in the wrong list :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Benji<me@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Quit whining
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
>>>> <cal.leeming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Sender: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:05:18
>>>> To:<full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reply-To: cal.leeming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
>>>>
>>>>    I still maintain this is completely out of topic for full-disclosure.
>>>> Maybe there should be a new list for this kind of gossip whoring?
>>>> [gossip-disclosure] maybe... *shrugs*
>>>>
>>>> On 07/10/2010 13:53, PsychoBilly wrote:
>>>>> False assertion, it's an attention whoring story for anyone in
>>>>> #sec..or in RPG
>>>>>
>>>>> 1- Fetch sparce elements
>>>>>        wget:
>>>>>        http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/10/cryptome-hacked/
>>>>>        https://eta.securesslhost.net/~pgpboar/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=129
>>>>>        http://cryptome.org/0002/cryptome-hack3.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> 2- Make your own salad ( who's chasing who ).
>>>>>
>>>>>        CRYPTOME<   Wikileaks Insiders>   WIKILEAKS (
>>>>> Ruxpin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx )
>>>>>        Wikileaks Insiders<>   pgpBoard ( the opponents ?[.gov]? )
>>>>>        J.A.<>   Wikileaks ( the .gov.target )
>>>>>        WIRED.COM<   Ruxpin>   Kim Zetter ( fear, Insiderzzzzz! +
>>>>> panic.nicetry )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ************************
>>>>>>      I'm not sure why everyone is so fussed about this tbh..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And surely, full-disclosure is no place for such a discussion either..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> </rant>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/10/2010 19:06, Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
>>>>>>> It's the newest tweet still.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Juha-Matti
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jeffrey Walton [noloader@xxxxxxxxx] kirjoitti:
>>>>>>>> The latest is kind of funny ("Latest smear attempt: Chinese spy
>>>>>>>> agency gave WikiLeaks $20M").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just call it a 'PAC Contribution' and everything will be fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Juha-Matti Laurio
>>>>>>>> <juha-matti.laurio@xxxxxxxx>     wrote:
>>>>>>>>> And nothing related is not tweeted at
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/wikileaks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Juha-Matti
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Harry Behrens [harry@xxxxxxxxxxx] kirjoitti:
>>>>>>>>>>       for 5 days and nothing about this to be found on google.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have an idea what is happening here - it does
>>>>>>>>>> smell slightly fishy...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>          -h
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/