Re: [Full-disclosure] DLL hijacking with Autorun on a USB drive

[Charles Morris <cmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Dan Kaminsky <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Again, the clicker can't differentiate word (the document) from word (the
> executable).  The clicker also can't differentiate word (the document) from
> word (the code equivalent script).
>
> The security model people keep presuming exists, doesn't.
>
> Even the situation whereby a dll is dropped into a directory of documents --
> the closest to a real exploit path there is -- all those docs can be
> repacked into executables.
>

What?

I can differentiate my coolProposal.doc from msword.exe just fine..

If your statement is that the windows defaults should be changed,
including the "hide extensions" default, then I wholeheartedly agree
as I detailed in my first post. It's the first thing I turn off.

Many people who think the same way have considered that a
vulnerability in windows for years, I wouldn't consider it part of
the "DLL Hijacking" fiasco.

Cheers,
Charles

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/