[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability
- To: paul.szabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability
- From: Marsh Ray <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 00:35:43 -0500
On 5/14/2010 12:16 AM, paul.szabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Dear Henri,
>
>> Have you requested CVE-identifier for this?
>
> No, sorry, do not know how to do. Was hoping that Wolfram would quickly
> (and "silently") fix the issue; otherwise maybe they can (must?) do.
I reported similar badness in some Intel tools for Linux. Their incident
response has been engaged, but I don't think either of us has requested
a CVE at this point.
Questions for the group:
A. Does anyone think there would be much gained by me requesting (or
insisting on) a CVE number?
B. Does anybody actually care about local escalations any more, or is
everyone just expected to have their very own personal virtual private
cloud for a security boundary?
Thanks,
- Marsh
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/