[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] go public to avoid jail
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] go public to avoid jail
- From: PsychoBilly <zpamh0l3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 11:01:51 +0200
The_UT went to jail because his Gonzales m8 kindly supplied irc logs of their
chats to the fed // not for coding a tool.
The jury recused the "not knowing" defense strategy on that base.
[[ J Roger ]] possibly emitted, @Time [[ 28/04/2010 00:48 ]] The
Following #String
> jail.
>
> According to the following (dated) Wired article,
> http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/stephen-watt/ Stephen Watt got
> screwed because he supplied his friend with a software tool he wrote and
> his friend used it to commit a crime.
>
> Had Stephen released his tool to the public (with as much or as little
> fanfare as he liked) would he still have gone to jail?
>
> He could make a good argument for legitimate uses of his tool as well.
> It would be useful for anyone performing a PCI penetration test in
> compliance with PCI DSS 11.3
>
> Remember kids, sharing is caring (that you not spend the next 2 years in
> federal prison)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/