[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] newest category of security bugs considered elite ?
- To: "full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] newest category of security bugs considered elite ?
- From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 12:30:28 +1200
Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> I really like the hash length declaration bugs, where the client can
> tell the server how many bytes of a hash need to be validated. (Yep,
> you just say "one byte is plenty")
>
> SNMPv3 and XML-DSIG both fell to this, catastrophically.
I thought Georgi asked for the newest class of elite vulns?
Does (at least) ten years old count as new?
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms00-072.mspx
And against Win9x count as elite? 8-)
FWIW, MS00-072 was fairly widely exploited in the wild by at least the
Opaserv (aka Opasoft) family of worms, though not until a couple (?) of
years after the bulletin's release.
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/