On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:48:11 EDT, Michael Holstein said:
> You've already stated in a prior email that you have no involvement with
> PCI implementation on either side of the fence ("hell no", was your
> answer, I believe) .. so I don't see where you're really qualified to
> make a categorical statement that PCI compliance lends nothing to security.
To be fair - the claim has mutated a bit along the way.
What it *started* as was more like: "Once you've spent money actually securing
the enterprise, then the time and money spent on actually getting the audit done
is "wasted" from a security viewpoint, as that time/money isn't actually getting
spent on something that affects security."
Your site runs a relatively tight ship already. You read the PSI specs, and you
spend $10K and 2 man-months getting compliant because your ship isn't totally
tight, and there's a few things you should have done. That's not wasted
security-wise.
You then pay $10K and 4 man-weeks to actually get the audit done.
What actual *security* benefit do you get from that $10K and 4 man-weeks?
Pretty much zero, unless you stretch it to the risk-management side and
have to declare "risk of not getting PCI compliance impacting our revenue
stream" on an SEC filing. But that's one heck of a stretch.
Attachment:
pgp7IiGE1jnGV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/