[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds
- To: Digital X <digitalx00@xxxxxxxxx>, Tracy Reed <treed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds
- From: Shaqe Wan <sha8e@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Yep, your right. The auditors nowadays even ask for an AV on a *n?x OS (what a
shame) !!!
________________________________
From: Digital X <digitalx00@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tracy Reed <treed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Nick FitzGerald
<nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Full-disclosure <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 3:48:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds
> PCI only requires antivirus for systems commonly affected by
> viruses. This means Windows. PCI security council has said that UN*X
> OSs etc. are not required to have antivirus.
>
> --
> Tracy Reed
> http://tracyreed.org
Just an FYI...if your nix devices are in scope, my last audit (4 weeks ago)
directed me to install A/V plus a rootkit finder on linux devices in scope.
Whitelisting is an alternative, but seems more a headache then A/V. Hope
this helps someone somewhere.
James
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/