Re: [Full-disclosure] Possible RDP vulnerability

[Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>However, it was a trick question.

ZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Mr. Hinky Dink <dink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> In your case, had you answered the question correctly I would have promised
> to never (again) blog about you arguing with Craig S. Wright.
>
> However, it was a trick question.  There is no way to do it with Group
> Policy (at least not with XP and Server 2003... maybe they changed that in
> Windows Vis7a and Server 2008, but I really haven't kept up with the tech).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <Thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mr. Hinky Dink" <dink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> <Full-Disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:09 PM
> Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Possible RDP vulnerability
>
>
> Oh, sorry I read the question wrong.  Just don't allow them to "attach"
> their local drives.  Simple.
>
> Still, what do I win?
>
> t
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/