Re: [Full-disclosure] Voting for bans

[Clement Gamé <clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Yep, with a large amount of that being from narcissists that just
> *have* to get their jokes or jibes in and can't either ignore him or,
> better yet, just hit delete.
>
>   
>> He is struggling for reactions on his topics, and he will always get some
>> reactions (Yes, even if I don't respond). The noise in the last days was
>> terrible.
>>     
>
> Yes it has been. Again, though, it's been mostly from folks that want
> to get in their snide comments or make themselves look good with their
> jabs and pokes; the signal level would again go up if they'd let it
> rest and just hit delete.
>
>   
Yes, we all want to shine in society and be loved and venerated among 
our peers..in short we're constantly seeking for approval.
This is how the world works and you know what ? you're not an exception 
dude !


>> We have the freedom to ban him from your inboxes. Let's do it!
>>     
>
> Like I said, kill-file. It really does work.
>
> Seriously, Jan, I do understand where you're coming from but banning
> account after account does no good in a world of unlimited email
> accounts. What *does* work is to let someone post at will and simply
> ignoring what you don't want to reply to. The problem isn't that we
> have one person that posts a ton of crud, it's that we have one person
> that posts and fifty that insist on commenting about how it's crud -
> and then continue to harp about how that single poster needs to go
> away when he replies to each of them.
>
> kmw
>
>   


-- 
Clément Gamé
CEO

digi-nation.com S.A.R.L
1 rue carnot
95300 Pontoise
France
+33.6.73.65.17.47

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/