Re: [Full-disclosure] EasyJet is storing user passwords in the clear

[Michael Neal Vasquez <mnv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If I reread your statement, and take it as "70% of people's passwords suck"
-- I'd have to agree.  I'd say though, for the remaining 30%, algorithm
choice, even without salting, can make a difference.  My password audits go
much quicker when LM is enabled, vs NTLM.  Same for MD5 vs SHA1.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Dan Kaminsky <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Michael Neal Vasquez <
> mnv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Dan Kaminsky <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Sai,
>>>
>>>    I see where you're coming from, but what are the most recent
>>> statistics on the effectiveness of hash cracking?  Isn't it something like
>>> 70% of the passwords in the field can be cracked with a minimal amount of
>>> brute forcing?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 70% ?
>>
>> Plain MD5 perhaps, but I don't think salted, or sha1, etc, have anywhere
>> near such high success rates.
>>
>
> The problem isn't in the algorithm -- it's in the passwords themselves.
> Salting helps in that the attacker can't amortize the work effort across the
> entire population, but at the end of the day, even PBKDF2 isn't going to do
> much against 1234567890 and its ilk.
>
> To put it another way, if EasyJet *did* have a breach, they couldn't very
> well say "It's OK, because the passwords were hashed".
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/