[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- To: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@xxxxxxxxx>, Rohit Patnaik <quanticle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Charles Skoglund <charles.skoglund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:11:10 +0100
This discussion is getting weirder and weirder. If an examiner finds
evidence on YOUR computer / cell phone / usb disks / whatever, please do
tell me how it's not necessarily yours? By claiming your computer has been
hacked? You do know an examiner usually knows how to double-check your story
for malicious code right? Or what are you guys talking about?
My experience is that when I find the evidence, the person/s being
investigated confesses quite rapidly.
Cheers!
On 1/26/10 4:31 AM, "Bipin Gautam" <bipin.gautam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from
> day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT
> NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........?
> oops.................
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/