Re: [Full-disclosure] more on that

[dramacrat <yirimyah@xxxxxxxxx>]

well, all that really depends on the theory that the OP actually read it
prior to executing it.

2009/11/26 Andrew Farmer <andfarm@xxxxxxxxx>

> On 24 Nov 2009, at 13:41, Tyler Durten wrote:
> > And this is what I'm talking about:
> > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2005/Apr/412
>
>
> ... which reads, in part:
> > main()
> > {
> >
> > //Section Initialises designs implemented by mexicans
> > //Imigrate
> > system(launcher);
> > system(netcat_shell);
> > system(shellcode);
>
> I can understand possibly overlooking something clever (like a fake exploit
> that buffer-overflows itself), but this isn't even marginally subtle.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/