[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt files



From: Gregor Schneider <rc46fi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt 
files
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:41:48 +0100
> Today, a computer often has become a part of the mind - notes, diaries
> and so on. Therefore, this case to me is somehow equivalent to putting
> someone into jail just because he does not want to answer a question -
> which is definatelay a violation of a fundamental human right.

Indeed, I seem to recall that in the decision of the German high court (the 
country where bureacrats are maybe the most advanced in understanding 
technology) there was a reasoning to that effect, e.g. arguing that the 
contents of computers fall under the freedom of thought, since you use them to 
put down your everyday thoughts.  I could be mistaken about the fact though, 
but the line of thought is really interesting: to recognise in the legal system 
the fact that in practice we became cyborgs: our neural circuits are 
interrupted and wired to our notebooks.  Not a new thing, that one about using 
notebooks, of course (that changed happened a long time ago), but still widely 
unrecognised. 8-/

--

×× maxigas
// villanypásztor / kiberpunk / web shepherd //

"For us it was but a game -- that's why we took it more seriously than others."

-= Important communication disclaimer: by replying to my emails you are 
disclaiming all your disclaimers. =- 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/