[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt files
- To: rc46fi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt files
- From: maxigas <maxigas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:08:40 +0000 (GMT)
From: Gregor Schneider <rc46fi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] UK jails schizophrenic for refusal to decrypt
files
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:41:48 +0100
> Today, a computer often has become a part of the mind - notes, diaries
> and so on. Therefore, this case to me is somehow equivalent to putting
> someone into jail just because he does not want to answer a question -
> which is definatelay a violation of a fundamental human right.
Indeed, I seem to recall that in the decision of the German high court (the
country where bureacrats are maybe the most advanced in understanding
technology) there was a reasoning to that effect, e.g. arguing that the
contents of computers fall under the freedom of thought, since you use them to
put down your everyday thoughts. I could be mistaken about the fact though,
but the line of thought is really interesting: to recognise in the legal system
the fact that in practice we became cyborgs: our neural circuits are
interrupted and wired to our notebooks. Not a new thing, that one about using
notebooks, of course (that changed happened a long time ago), but still widely
unrecognised. 8-/
--
×× maxigas
// villanypásztor / kiberpunk / web shepherd //
"For us it was but a game -- that's why we took it more seriously than others."
-= Important communication disclaimer: by replying to my emails you are
disclaiming all your disclaimers. =-
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/