Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Patents the "sudo" command

["Larry Seltzer" <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/New-Microsoft-patent-may-put-
Linux-security-components-at-risk-857848.html

>From the article:

> This behaviour is very similar to that of PolicyKit, with the only 
> apparent difference being that PolicyKit requires applications to 
> request privileges, whereas the 7,617,350 patent allows the operating 
> system to block a privileged action and then offer the user a way to 
> raise their privileges.

I'm not a fan of software patents, but this seems to be a meaningful
difference. Apps aren't written for Windows to request privilege
elevation and a system which handles it automatically is a better one.

And as the article says, the claim in the subject line of this thread is
nonsense. It's obvious to anyone who reads the patent, which is a very
short one.

Larry Seltzer
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larry_seltzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/