[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] How Prosecutors Wiretap Wall Street
- From: mikelitoris@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:06:42 -0800
> But to gather intelligence about what terrorists are up to, even
if a US citizen is involved, should not require a warrant.
This is all well and good, until the definition of terrorist is
changed and you become labeled a "terrorist" because your "reason"
is suddenly counterproductive to someone else's "opinion". You
must apply the warrant requirement consistently. Otherwise, when
interpretation of the word "terrorist" changes, it affects the
meaning of the law. And call me crazy, but I'm just not willing to
assume that someone won't abuse the power of being able to surveil
US citizens and do exactly what Nixon did, spy on their
competition/detractors. Surely you can admit that some people do
things that they wouldn't normally do when big money and big power
are involved. After all, "Those who cannot learn from history are
doomed to repeat it." Don't be so naive to think it can't happen
again.
> Intelligence works best in a world of secrecy.
So does deception. Significantly more so, in fact.
> As I've pointed out now several times, it's analogous to people
that get all hot and bothered by the fact that admins have access
to the data on their computers.
Yes, but that computer probably doesn't belong to me but instead to
my employer. If it belongs to me, you better have a policy that
prevents me from using it at work, and/or a login disclaimer
informing me of your right to monitor what I do if I connect to
your network. If not, you better damn well have a warrant if you
want to take a look at my property. And as far as I know, there's
no login disclaimer on the interwebs that allows the government to
monitor what I do on that network, nor on the telephone, or my
mobile phone contract.
> From what I've read getting a warrant in 72 hours is almost
impossible.
Ahah! Now we're on to something. Here's an idea. Make it easier
to get that warrant when you need it. Improve the process, so that
when requested, a warrant can be turned around in hours, not days.
Don't remove the requirement altogether. That's simply inviting
trouble.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/