[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] When is it valid to claim that a vulnerability leads to a remote attack?



On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:32:49 CDT, Rohit Patnaik said:
> Well, why are you relying on Thierry's clock to date your message?
> Your e-mail client should use your local clock/mail server clock to
> timestamp messages.

Hint: your e-mail client *can't* timestamp this message, because it has
no *clue* when I hit send on this message.  Consider that you can't even
trust the timestamp on the first Received: header, because I could very
well have composed the mail and hit send while offline, and it got posted
to a server once I had network connectivity again.

The  sending MUA is responsible for this, but often an end-user MUA will fail
to add a Date: header and the fixup is done at the first mail server,

Attachment: pgpwmujbW6l3N.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/