Re: [Full-disclosure] Why FD should unban n3td3v.

[vulcanius <vulcanius@xxxxxxxxx>]

The readers did decide, that's why he's banned. If you still like
reading his garbage go find whatever bridge he's currently living
under and subscribe. If you believe that the days with n3td3v on the
list were FD's glory days you're either ignorant or stupid.

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:56 AM, John Q Publix<johnqpublicr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some of you may call n3td3v annoying, others may call him funny,
> but others may genuinely value his comments on the list.
>
> Leave it up to the reader to decide.
>
> FD exists to be unmoderated and uncensored. This list is a great
> thing, and I'm requesting that it be restored to it's former glory.
>
> While I'm no fan of n3td3v, censoring him sets a dangerous
> precedent. If I wanted to filter out his mails client-side, I still
> could btw.
>
> Just don't censor him on the server.
>
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> john q public
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/